Lorenzo Quinn's Hand of God. Find more here.
My daughter is moving in with me! That’s right.
Miss Victoria A. Henley will be attending Stephen F. Austin StateUniversity this month. “The Estate” will
be her domicile for that new beginning.
If you wonder who she is, perhaps this post will give you perspective. Or maybe this. Who knows?
I’m saying this because I “met” a young woman who brought
out my “dad” instincts today. This was
U.S. Embassy day in the Henley “household.”
The day we would/could/should get
approved for a CR-1 visa for Mrs. Henley. After a rough start to the day, we jumped
into the cattle call of the final frontier of the process. It went very well…until someone compared names on documents. Who does that??!!!!???!!!
"On the next episode of Paul Screws Up..."
THIS IS FRUSTRATING!!!!!!!
The form in question is the “proof” that Raquel was never
married. I get it; that’s
important. HOWEVER—
- We needed this documentation just to get married.
- We needed this documentation to pass the “border patrol” portion of the process.
- We needed this documentation with the State Department before the Embassy got involved.
So…the fourth
iteration of this might not be correct?
Because her PARENTS names are different in this version????
Thanks for protecting me—just like the Japanese government
protected me from my own toothpaste on the way through Tokyo. Passed the U.S. TSA…but Japan knows that the extra ounce-or-whatever will EXPLODE.
In both cases, I am soooooo grateful for government
protection from myself.
I’m not as bitter about this as I could be—or might have been, though. In the midst of the process, I was given the gift of perspective.
I might have taken a picture of her. She was relatively attractive (not Raquel standard, but still
good-looking). She was about the age of
my oldest daughter (Victoria). She was
interviewing to get a K-1 (fiancée) visa.
I know this because the U.S. Embassy in Manila uses an intercom system
to communicate: the interviewer is behind bullet-proof glass; the
interviewee/victim is facing away from the seated folks waiting their
turn. Imagine going to a drive-thru bank
and just standing and listening to the interview questions—then you infer her
answers. You can’t “not hear” such
stimuli, and it put things in perspective for me. Near as I can tell, the following points are
true.
- She hadn’t known the guy all that long.
- She knew his basic information.
- He had come to visit, and she seemed to have pictures.
- Her fiancée didn’t have any arrests.
- He had children, but he didn’t see them.
- She had one child of her own.
After a little while of some back-and-forth, the interviewer
re-phrased his questions. So you are saying you have no knowledge of
any arrests for your fiancée? Is that
it?
She nodded. I could
sense where this was going (so can you).
I must inform you that
in September 2016, your fiancée was arrested for domestic violence. Do you know what that means? He was arrested for beating his wife. This is in 2016, also, so it’s recent. I need to also tell you that a court found
him to be a threat to his wife and his children so that he is not allowed to
see his children. He has a restraining
order against him, which means that he cannot come in contact with his wife or
his children. That’s why he doesn’t know
much about his children.
Now, knowing this
information, do you still want to move forward with the fiancée visa process?
Short, fast, quick nodding for about .4 seconds.
OK, so you want to
move forward knowing that your fiancée has been convicted of beating his
wife. Recently. Is that correct?
More nods…this time a little larger.
OK, I must also inform
you that if you feel threatened at any point, you need to dial 911, and the
police will come and protect you. They
won’t take your visa away because you called 911. Do you understand that?
More nods…ugh.
Her visa was held up for some “unrelated” reason—one similar
to ours. I’m hoping the folks at the
embassy do this to delay her decision.
I get it. If you say
“No, I don’t want to continue” then that’s it.
You’re out of options. It seems
that (even in this circumstance) the prudent thing to do is keep your options
open…to see if there could be some
way it could work.
…but what an awful
thing to discover at that point…
I wanted to reach out, but I knew an older American wouldn’t
sway her opinion or decision. Plus, the
embassy deals with this daily. It would
be like going to a police station to lecture women about domestic violence as a
“Self-Appointed Expert.” At some point,
you’re just a loudmouth with an opinion.
This was past that point.
Perspective is soooo important. I was “#blessed” to be given that perspective
today, of all days. Expectations lead to
resentment. I’m working HARD to not
expect stuff. When I do that, I am
pleasantly surprised quite often…and disappointed much less. It might still work. Perhaps a tourist visa or something.
There could be a quick turnaround, and we could jet off to Houston to experience the unexpected world we will inhabit together.
My guess is Raq’s visa will be available about 24-48 hours
after the plane to Houston takes off in Manila.
I likely will be on that plane…alone…again. I will go back to a clean house (thanks to
Miss Victoria Henley) and prepare to start the academic year. I will look for an opportunity to bring my
wife to America; I will take the first real one I get.